Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Odd identd behavior |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:00:14 +0100 |
On 2005-11-16 Levenglick, Jeff wrote:
You scanning someone else without their permission is not network trouble shooting.
That's a completely unfounded assertion. First of all, I don't need anyone's permission to to a scan. Period. It's a common but nonetheless wrong claim that a scan (which is merely a way to determine which services are running on a specific host) would require someone's permission. Second, you can use nmap in several ways. You may very well probe one specific service instead of running a full-scale scan. Third, finding out what causes specific (suspicious) entries in my logs qualifies very well as network troubleshooting. At least in my book.
The law is very open. Yes, there is nothing on nmap,
There's not only nothing on nmap, but nothing on port-scanners or port- scanning in general.
but isp's have usage statements that target server and hacking tools. (Ie: a home user is not supposed to use their line for a server.... ect)
Not every ISP has theses statements, and anyone who agrees to conditions like that deserves what they get. Besides, the terms of an ISP contract hardly qualify as "legal trouble".
You can pretty much call any isp and complain about a scan and have them warn or suspend an account. Granted, it needs to be a valid scan, not a quick few second random scan.
If my ISP would suspend my account because of someone complaining about a portscan, they'd find themselves in court faster than they can spell "lawsuit". Regards Ansgar Wiechers P.S.: Please don't CC me, I do read this list. -- "Another option [for defragmentation] is to back up your important files, erase the hard disk, then reinstall Mac OS X and your backed up files." --http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=25668
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Odd identd behavior, Manuel Lanctot |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Odd identd behavior, Levenglick, Jeff |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Odd identd behavior, Levenglick, Jeff |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Odd identd behavior, Christopher Carpenter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |