Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: SSH bruteforce on its way... |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 24 Oct 2005 23:13:46 -0400 |
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:05:27 -0000, jouser@gmail.com said:
I didn't think it was possible to determine valid usernames by themselves? You either have a valid username AND password or not.
So you take the list of 30-40 "installed by default" userids, add a list of 100 or so common first names/last names, prepend/append a single letter (i.e. starting with "john" and "smith", also try "jsmith" and "johns"). Then try each of those with a list of common passwords. If you're *really* 31337, you apply the SSH timing hole to possibly identify valid userids - but it really isn't needed because it's just as cheap to just try all 40,000 combinations of userid/password (remember, you're doing this from somebody else's compromised system).
pgpoV5ZQDzrDH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| Previous by Date: | Re: Dismantling Botnets?, Thorsten Holz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: SSH bruteforce on its way..., Michael . Lang |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SSH bruteforce on its way..., Daniel Cid |
| Next by Thread: | Re: SSH bruteforce on its way..., Michael . Lang |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |