Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Strange attack question - seems udp |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:30:37 -0500 |
You don't see any ports because these are packet fragments (hence the "offset <number>"). This looks like some sort of malicious traffic because the offset of each sequential packet is wrong, the next offset is starting before the last one ended. These overlapping values are an older type of attack called a Teardrop attack. -----Original Message----- From: Mihai Tanasescu [mailto:mihai@duras.ro] Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:09 PM To: incidents@securityfocus.com Subject: Strange attack question - seems udp Hello, I've been getting things like these recently: 21:00:52.941148 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 127, id 28639, offset 11840, flags [+], length: 1500) 86.104.102.16 > 70.84.247.164: udp 21:00:52.941271 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 127, id 28639, offset 13320, flags [+], length: 1500) 86.104.102.16 > 70.84.247.164: udp 21:00:52.941394 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 127, id 28639, offset 14800, flags [+], length: 1500) 86.104.102.16 > 70.84.247.164: udp 21:00:52.941517 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 127, id 28639, offset 16280, flags [+], length: 1500) 86.104.102.16 > 70.84.247.164: udp 21:00:52.941640 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 127, id 28639, offset 17760, flags [+], length: 1500) 86.104.102.16 > 70.84.247.164: udp I have 24 subnets inside a Cisco 3750. After receiving many packets like these on 3-4 interfaces, Cisco starts loosing packets and acts abnormal. I have gathered the output show above from a Linux machine with tcpdump which acts as a border router. What I find strange is that there is no port specified (src,dst) and that the length of the packets is always 1500. Is there any way to filter something like this on the Cisco switch ? Is it caused by a virus or by a human ? (I have seen it from 3-4 different interfaces at a time and with 4-6 different destination IPs) Any help will be greatly appreciated. Sorry if I have posted this to the wrong list.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Strange attack question - seems udp, Mihai Tanasescu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Strange attack question - seems udp, Carles Fragoso i Mariscal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Strange attack question - seems udp, Mihai Tanasescu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Strange attack question - seems udp, Dick St.Peters |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |