Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Cisco vulnerability scanning increase |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 6 Sep 2005 08:49:43 -0700 (PDT) |
Thanks for all the feedback. I'm not really worried about being vulnerable, as indeed any wise network admin turns off the web interface for routers and switches. More so, I was worried if my corp was being specifically targetted or not. When you see 200+ IP's hitting some specific machines on your network, I would tend to worry about a potential DoS. From all the replies, apparently it is more widespread and not just after me. Thanks again. - Jack Bristow
----- Original Message ----- From: <morriswurm@yahoo.com> To: <incidents@securityfocus.com> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 12:17 PM Subject: Cisco vulnerability scanning increaseWe recently picked up a spike in TCP 80 scanningagainst one of ournetblocks. Looking at the payload, it appears to be a Ciscovulnerability scanner./level/16/exec/-///pwd Numerous random source IP's across variousnetblocks, makes it appear tobe bot related potentially. Anyone else seeingthis type of activity?
______________________________________________________
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Cisco vulnerability scanning increase, Jose Nazario |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Incident legal plan??, Michele Jordan |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Cisco vulnerability scanning increase, Smith, Brad |
| Next by Thread: | Re: vulnerability in glocation.cgi?, Christine Kronberg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |