Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Incidents
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: strange software > winsupdater.exe

Subject: Re: strange software > winsupdater.exe
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:30:59 +1300
Valdis to Harlan:

However, you _can_ get a warm fuzzy if the file has
the MS file version information compiled into it. 

And you verify the authenticity of your warm fuzzy how, exactly? 

Rumour has it that MS will be making its WarmFuzzy Verifer beta release 
within a month...

const char MS_version[] = "bogus MS file version info goes here";

Well, it is done a bit differently from that, but the basic idea is 
right.

And it's already been done.  Heaps.  Especially by some of the adware 
developers...

(Remember - we've already had major worms that crafted a totally bogus
"X-Virus: scanned by" header claiming a real AV had scanned it....)

Yep -- even the skiddies have thought of this level of trivial 
deception.

That warm fuzzy can be increased if the file is
digitally signed by MS.

First, go back and re-read http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2001-04.html

8-)

Second, remember that you're worried that the machine is compromised - and
you're asking it to verify the signature.  Again, if the box is compromised,
the DLL that verifies signatures could be backdoored as well.

Indeed, although to date I certainly haven't seen this done and don't 
recall hearing of this level of deception.  It's probably not far off 
though -- it would be a trivial addition to any of the modestly clever 
rootkits, but does not require that degree of complexity.


Regards,

Nick FitzGerald

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>