Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: strange software > winsupdater.exe |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:30:59 +1300 |
Valdis to Harlan:
However, you _can_ get a warm fuzzy if the file has the MS file version information compiled into it.And you verify the authenticity of your warm fuzzy how, exactly?
Rumour has it that MS will be making its WarmFuzzy Verifer beta release within a month...
const char MS_version[] = "bogus MS file version info goes here";
Well, it is done a bit differently from that, but the basic idea is right. And it's already been done. Heaps. Especially by some of the adware developers...
(Remember - we've already had major worms that crafted a totally bogus "X-Virus: scanned by" header claiming a real AV had scanned it....)
Yep -- even the skiddies have thought of this level of trivial deception.
That warm fuzzy can be increased if the file is digitally signed by MS.First, go back and re-read http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2001-04.html
8-)
Second, remember that you're worried that the machine is compromised - and you're asking it to verify the signature. Again, if the box is compromised, the DLL that verifies signatures could be backdoored as well.
Indeed, although to date I certainly haven't seen this done and don't recall hearing of this level of deception. It's probably not far off though -- it would be a trivial addition to any of the modestly clever rootkits, but does not require that degree of complexity. Regards, Nick FitzGerald
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: strange software > winsupdater.exe, Valdis . Kletnieks |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Pubstro rash, David Gillett |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: strange software > winsupdater.exe, Valdis . Kletnieks |
| Next by Thread: | Re: strange software > winsupdater.exe, Harlan Carvey |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |