Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: UDP Port Sweep question |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 29 Dec 2004 12:11:21 -0800 (PST) |
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Billy Dodson wrote:
Here is some more info regarding the port sweeps. The port the client is being hit on seems to vary. The client is being hit on the same 8 port range from each IP port 33434-33460. All 3 sensors from the 3 different clients show the same destination port range. The sensors are cisco IDS sensors and I am unsure as to how to get the actual packet from the event.
-- Benjamin Franz
"All right, where is the answer? The battle of wits has begun. It ends when you click and we both serve pages - and find out who is right, and who is slashdotted." - David Brandt
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: UDP Port Sweep question, Jack McCarthy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: UDP Port Sweep question, Colby DeRodeff |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: UDP Port Sweep question, Jack McCarthy |
| Next by Thread: | RE: UDP Port Sweep question, Colby DeRodeff |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |