Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: SIP based attacks?? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:30:02 -0800 |
Last I saw, the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) was being championed exclusively by Microsoft and everyone else was using the IETF standard XMPP.
This is a Joke, right? I am unsure how a comment so lacking in accuracy or even informational content passed moderation! Nothing is actually contributed to the requestor's interest in _known_attacks_ on a widely-deployed, standard technology. SIP, Session Initiation Protocol, is described as an IETF RFC 3261. Draft participants include Avaya, Ericsson and AT&T - not Microsoft! http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt SIP is an Internet-style plain-text protocol, described as analogous to SMTP and HTTP. The IETF charter for the SIP Working Group, with links to all relevant RFCs, is here for review: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/sip-charter.html Products incorporating the SIP protocol are extensively catalogued - vendors include: AT&T, Lucent, Cisco, Ericsson, Nortel. MS is not even represented in this inventory: http://www.pulver.com/products/sip/ Until very recently, Microsoft was a backer of an earlier, inferior rival to SIP- the H.323 protocol. This is evidenced in the NetMeeting software, which MS is currently deprecating in favor of SIP-enabling MS Messenger and Live Communications Server. -- Jeremiah Cornelius CISSP CCNA MCSE+Sec
-----Original Message----- From: Jay D. Dyson [mailto:jdyson@treachery.net] Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 10:14 AM To: Incidents List Subject: Re: SIP based attacks?? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Mark Teicher wrote:Has anyone observed SIP network based exploits such as: Malformed SIP Message attacks SIP register flooding attacks Injection of unauthorized RTP session attacks DDOS intoexisting RTPFlow attacks RTP session hijacking attacks in a live production network not just simulation?Last I saw, the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) was being championed exclusively by Microsoft and everyone else was using the IETF standard XMPP. Moreover, most of the Microsoft SIP products were -- last time I looked -- hardly what you'd call ready for prime-time. Heck, 99.9% of the literature I've seen on SIP is little but a valentine that Microsoft wrote to itself. And I'm being nice here. The most recent news on the subject that I've seen indicated that Microsoft planned a release on December 1st for the latest version of its server software which (and I quote) "aims to give companies more secure instant messaging and other corporate communications tools." *ahem* Microsoft offering a "secure" service? That'll be a refreshing change from the usual MS-malware fare. - -Jay ( ( _______ )) )) .-"There's always time for a good cup of coffee"-. >====<--. C|~~|C|~~| (>----- Jay D. Dyson -- jdyson@treachery.net -----<) | = |-' `--' `--' `---- Doves fly in flocks. Eagles fly solo. ----' `------' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (TreacherOS) Comment: See http://www.treachery.net/~jdyson/ for current keys. iD8DBQFBsKzsBYoRACwSF0cRAjXcAJ91bMTy1Vfy8zECuHmP6Rb3usQ7YwCgqQGv 082LrVqg6wdkCuMqLWa8OCk= =ftmn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: SIP based attacks??, Jay D. Dyson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PHP injection attempt from 200.222.244.154, Jez Hancock |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SIP based attacks??, Jay D. Dyson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PHP injection attempt from 200.222.244.154, Jez Hancock |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |