Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Odd addresses on my wireless network |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 01 Dec 2004 13:32:25 -0500 |
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:11:29 PST, David Gillett said:
I help run a multicampus network of about 6000 nodes, with a very healthy set of DNS servers thank you very much. It's annoying, to say the least, when clueless users start spewing multicast all over it because Apple said it was okay to do that, and I'm extremely disappointed by the implication that the IETF is blessing this.
The fact that the IETF blessed a protocol for use in one environment and then idiots try to use it for other things is not news. Witness the fact that by some estimates, 98% of the traffic at the root name servers is due to queries from sites that can't do the DNS protocol correctly (for starters, some 30% have source addresses in rfc1918 space that leak out). http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0310/wessels.html http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0202/evi.html I'm not sure what the IETF can do other than try to urge the production of more rfc1925-compliant liveware. Suggestions that network issues could be cured by the application of chlorine to the gene pool are routinely rejected as an operational issue not a protocol issue.. ;)
pgpvwvKplnojU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Next by Date: | SIP based attacks??, Mark Teicher |
|---|---|
| Next by Thread: | SIP based attacks??, Mark Teicher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |