Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Localhost packets on WAN |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:37:40 -0500 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Once on the 26th and 8 times today we received packets from 127.0.0.1:80 to an ephemeral port on one of our WAN IPs. The one on the 26th was odd, but the ones today were very similar. They came in pairs, usually about 10 minutes apart for each packet in the pair. The pairs were about 1 hour apart.
The TTLs are all 121 which I make for a Windows box about 7 hops away. The packets today all looked almost identical to the one at the end of this message. The only differences are the ID field and the ephemeral port the packet went to. They all have the RST/ACK flags set. I checked a few of them, and there was no other traffic to/from that port anywhere near the time the bogus packets came in.
I'm going to be checking in the morning to see what my firewall would do with these sorts of packets, hopefully it is just throwing them away. Any ideas on what this is about? Some sort of recon, or other precursor to something I won't like?
No. Time Source Destination ~ Protocol Info ~ 4 2004-09-28 17:14:32.558443 127.0.0.1 WAN_IP TCP http > 1245 [RST, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=0 Win=0 Len=0
Frame 4 (60 bytes on wire, 60 bytes captured) ~ Arrival Time: Sep 28, 2004 17:14:32.558443000 ~ Time delta from previous packet: 1835.696862000 seconds ~ Time since reference or first frame: 185412.560781000 seconds ~ Frame Number: 4 ~ Packet Length: 60 bytes ~ Capture Length: 60 bytes Ethernet II, Src: 00:b0:64:2f:64:c1, Dst: 00:0e:db:00:1b:15 ~ Destination: 00:0e:db:00:1b:15 (Xincom_00:1b:15) ~ Source: 00:b0:64:2f:64:c1 (Cisco_2f:64:c1) ~ Type: IP (0x0800) ~ Trailer: 000000000000 Internet Protocol, Src Addr: 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1), Dst Addr: WAN_IP (WAN_IP) ~ Version: 4 ~ Header length: 20 bytes ~ Differentiated Services Field: 0x00 (DSCP 0x00: Default; ECN: 0x00) ~ 0000 00.. = Differentiated Services Codepoint: Default (0x00) ~ .... ..0. = ECN-Capable Transport (ECT): 0 ~ .... ...0 = ECN-CE: 0 ~ Total Length: 40 ~ Identification: 0x9d01 (40193) ~ Flags: 0x00 ~ 0... = Reserved bit: Not set ~ .0.. = Don't fragment: Not set ~ ..0. = More fragments: Not set ~ Fragment offset: 0 ~ Time to live: 121 ~ Protocol: TCP (0x06) ~ Header checksum: 0xfff1 (correct) ~ Source: 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) ~ Destination: WAN_IP (WAN_IP) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: http (80), Dst Port: 1245 (1245), Seq: 0, Ack: 0, Len: 0 ~ Source port: http (80) ~ Destination port: 1245 (1245) ~ Sequence number: 0 (relative sequence number) ~ Acknowledgement number: 0 (relative ack number) ~ Header length: 20 bytes ~ Flags: 0x0014 (RST, ACK) ~ 0... .... = Congestion Window Reduced (CWR): Not set ~ .0.. .... = ECN-Echo: Not set ~ ..0. .... = Urgent: Not set ~ ...1 .... = Acknowledgment: Set ~ .... 0... = Push: Not set ~ .... .1.. = Reset: Set ~ .... ..0. = Syn: Not set ~ .... ...0 = Fin: Not set ~ Window size: 0 ~ Checksum: 0x9817 (correct)
- -- Thank you,
Kirby Angell Get notified anytime your website goes down! http://www.alertra.com key: 9004F4C0 fingerprint: DD7E E88D 7F50 2A1E 229D 836A DB5B A751 9004 F4C0 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBWkok21unUZAE9MARAi3uAKCCPnuPxPpjNb8Ly7nrLGQgeSmx+gCfVnW+ jaWle8DnH+0n5ZZbtiToH5I= =J2PH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | data payload in SYN (Re: DoS/DDoS on port 1863(MSN protocol)), Martin Mačok |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Localhost packets on WAN, James C Slora Jr |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: DoS/DDoS on port 1863(MSN protocol), Arun Vishwanathan |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Localhost packets on WAN, James C Slora Jr |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |