Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Wireless router behaviour |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:01:39 -0400 |
Is the router a piece of your equipment or was it brought in for the attack? I know that some SOHO routers (I believe the 714P+ is one) are configured to keep the WAN connection alive by pinging the gateway. I'm not too familiar with that particular router, but maybe the activity you saw was part of that. It does seem a little frequent to point to a simple keep alive though. My two cents, Chris -----Original Message----- From: David Gillett [mailto:gillettdavid@fhda.edu] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 12:22 PM To: incidents@securityfocus.com Subject: Wireless router behaviour We recently suffered an intrusion attempt on our internal network. (Details aren't relevant to my question....) We traced the source back to an unauthorized wireless router (D-Link 714P+, if it matters) plugged into a live but unused network jack in a barely-accessible location. Before we had found the device, or ascertained its type, we were able to sniff the switch port it was on, and observed that it was pinging the network gateway about once per second. That doesn't sound like normal router behaviour to me. Has anyone else seen such a device do this? Is this something the intruder did to the router? (We have suspicion, but not actual certainty, that the router was placed by the same intruder as executed the network attacks. So the attacker may have had to first compromise the router to get access.) Dave Gillett
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Wireless router behaviour, David Gillett |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Wireless router behaviour, David Gillett |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Wireless router behaviour, David Gillett |
| Next by Thread: | Re: FW: [Intrusions] Linux SSH scanning - test/guest, Sebastian Jaenicke |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |