Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [ISSForum] ISSForum Digest, Vol 26, Issue 8 |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:23:01 -0500 |
I'm writing up a proposal for a client to install a Proventia G sensor with 1 segment. It includes deployment of the sensor and tweaking it a little so that they aren't seeing events they wish to ignore. How long should such an assignment take? Thank you -----Original Message----- From: issforum-bounces@iss.net [mailto:issforum-bounces@iss.net] On Behalf Of issforum-request@iss.net Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 12:01 PM To: issforum@iss.net Subject: ISSForum Digest, Vol 26, Issue 8 Send ISSForum mailing list submissions to issforum@iss.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://atla-mm1.iss.net/mailman/listinfo/issforum or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to issforum-request@iss.net You can reach the person managing the list at issforum-owner@iss.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of ISSForum digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Problemas con soporte (Juan Roa) 2. Re: Problemas con soporte (Javier Reyna Padilla) 3. Re: Better way for scanning Windows than creating an admin account? (sk00t) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:59:40 -0400 From: "Juan Roa" <juan.roa@orion2000.com> Subject: Re: [ISSForum] Problemas con soporte To: "E Palacio O." <epalacio@tsi-seguridad.com.mx> Cc: issforum@iss.net Message-ID: <ATLMAIEXCP08GxegIqu0008c7fb@atlmaiexcp08.iss.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi: I had opened about 10 support cases in the last two months, and we have very quick response from ISS support ion all the cases. Do you ever try to open a issue on the web page ? sometimes is faster than the automatic response. Unfortunately there is no support in spanish. Atte Juan Roa Salinas Chile "E Palacio O." <epalacio@tsi-seguridad.com.mx> on Lunes, 13 de Marzo de 2006 at 13:53 -0400 wrote:
To all of you outside North America and EMEA: Our customers have been experiencing problems to report incidents to ISS, 1. - There is an automatic response system that takes sometimes a week or more to answer. 2.- The answer is to give an incident number and to request for them to repeat what the problem is. 3.- The anwer has to be given in less than 2 days or the incident is closed. In a recent event one of them received the first answer from ISS Support after 13 days. 4. Then it begings the Way of the Cross with one request after the other and no answer to the original question or to the original problem. 5. Then finally and after some arguments you finally get somebody that understand the problem and gives you a solution or alternative. This may takes several weeks. My question: Are you suffering the same treatment as we are receiving here in M?xico? If not, what are you doing different? Calling by phone to suport is not an option to the great majority of our customers that only speak spanish. What is happening to ISS support? The automatic response system just stink. We are open to suggestion and reasonable recomendations. Thanks and Regards
Juan Roa Salinas IEI - SOC Senior Manager - SGMS Phone: (56 2) 6403981, (56 9) 1003695 e-mail: juan@orion2000.com web site: www.orion.cl Orion 2000 S.A. - Chile Soluciones en Seguridad de la Informacion Empresa certificada BS 7799:2002 | ISO 9001:2000 ---------------------------------------------------- La informacion contenida en esta transmision es confidencial, amparada por secreto profesional y esta dirigida exclusivamente a el o los destinatarios indicados. Cualquier uso, reproduccion, divulgacion o distribucion por otras personas que su(s) destinatario(s) esta estrictamente prohibida. Las opiniones expresadas en este correo son las de su autor y no son necesariamente compartidas o apoyadas por la compania. --------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:15:30 -0600 From: Javier Reyna Padilla <jreyna@onlinet.com.mx> Subject: Re: [ISSForum] Problemas con soporte To: issforum@iss.net Message-ID: <ATLMAIEXCP086MkKKhD0008d98d@atlmaiexcp08.iss.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed I am from Mexico too, and I am having no problems with ISS's support, in fact I think ISS has one of the best support. In the mayority of the cases I use the e-mail support, and I have a response sometimes the same day but no more of 2 days. If the problem is the idiom, well that's not ISS's problem, is yours or maybe your clients fault. E Palacio O. wrote:
To all of you outside North America and EMEA: Our customers have been experiencing problems to report incidents to ISS, 1. - There is an automatic response system that takes sometimes a week or more to answer. 2.- The answer is to give an incident number and to request for them to repeat what the problem is. 3.- The anwer has to be given in less than 2 days or the incident is closed. In a recent event one of them received the first answer from ISS Support after 13 days. 4. Then it begings the Way of the Cross with one request after the other and no answer to the original question or to the original problem. 5. Then finally and after some arguments you finally get somebody that understand the problem and gives you a solution or alternative. This may takes several weeks. My question: Are you suffering the same treatment as we are receiving here in M?xico? If not, what are you doing different? Calling by phone to suport is not an option to the great majority of our customers that only speak spanish. What is happening to ISS support? The automatic response system just
stink.
We are open to suggestion and reasonable recomendations. Thanks and Regards Eduardo Palacio O. Consultor __________________________________________________ Correo Yahoo! Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ?gratis! Reg?strate ya - http://correo.yahoo.com.mx/ _______________________________________________ ISSForum mailing list ISSForum@iss.net TO UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, go to
https://atla-mm1.iss.net/mailman/listinfo/issforum
To contact the ISSForum Moderator, send email to mod-issforum@iss.net The ISSForum mailing list is hosted and managed by Internet Security
Systems, 6303 Barfield Road, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 30328.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:35:31 -0600 (CST)
From: sk00t <sk00t@cipherpunx.org>
Subject: Re: [ISSForum] Better way for scanning Windows than creating
an admin account?
To: issforum@iss.net
Message-ID: <ATLMAIEXCP08Ije6n0s0008dcfe@atlmaiexcp08.iss.local>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Just thought I would let everyone on the list know that Foundstone and Eeye
both have really nice docs on how to do scans and get the same results
without admin rights by settings corrects perms on registry keys and
allowing access to C$ / IPC$ / etc.
ISS, get on the ball, y'all.
-- sk00t
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, sk00t wrote:
I have been researching the need for an account with administrative rights
for running scans of Windows boxes. Our NT administrators are uncomfortable with this, and I think understandably so. If someone came to me and said they needed a service account with admin access to all boxes on the domain for their application to run, I would tell them it's a really bad idea, so it reflects poorly on us when the security team is asking for this, doesn't it?
Has anyone found a better way to do this? With Nessus (ahem), I have been
able to create a non-admin account with interactive login disabled and just rights to specific registry keys to perform scans for patches. Can I do the same, or something similar for Scanner?
To me this is a much better way to do this, because it's more suited to
leaving the account enable for automated scans.
Any thoughts from the group? Thanks! -- sk00t
------------------------------ _______________________________________________ ISSForum mailing list ISSForum@iss.net TO UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, go to https://atla-mm1.iss.net/mailman/listinfo/issforum TO CONTACT THE ISSForum MODERATOR, send email to mod-issforum@iss.net The ISSForum mailing list is hosted and managed by Internet Security Systems, 6303 Barfield Road, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 30328. End of ISSForum Digest, Vol 26, Issue 8 *************************************** _______________________________________________ ISSForum mailing list ISSForum@iss.net TO UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, go to https://atla-mm1.iss.net/mailman/listinfo/issforum To contact the ISSForum Moderator, send email to mod-issforum@iss.net The ISSForum mailing list is hosted and managed by Internet Security Systems, 6303 Barfield Road, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 30328.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [ISSForum] SSL not supported for server sensor, Hertzog, Albert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ISSForum] Blocking bots G400, Reed, Jason \(ISS Texas\) |
| Previous by Thread: | [ISSForum] SSL not supported for server sensor, Hertzog, Albert |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ISSForum] ISSForum Digest, Vol 26, Issue 8, CNorris |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |