Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [ISSForum] LOGDB:LogWithRaw |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:14:33 -0800 (PST) |
I've noticed some instances when you have a signature set to LogWithRaw, and its automatically cleared by the sensor. That is, as soon as the event is generated on the sensor, the sensor sets the cleared bit to 1, and as such, you never see the event in the console display. If you want to see any cleared events, just configure your console to include the Cleared Count column as well. Cheers - Jack --- Sergey V Soldatov <SVSoldatov@tnk.ru> wrote:
AFAIK, LogWithRaw is the only convenient way to see raw packet data of event. In this case raw packet data will bw stored in DB and can be viewed in event details. Please, if someone has something to add to my explanation about LogWithRaw, inform me, because this parameter is very poor descrabed in docs and student's guides. I tried to use this for analysis of IM activities, LDAP sessions, etc, where user credentials are transferred in clear text. But I'd found that after changing LOGDB form LogWithoutRow to LogWithRaw these events had stopped to be shown in SP Console. I could see events with LogWithRaw switched on in Event Viewer, but not in Console. Can someone help me to understand what's the problem? Another question is for ISS or somebody who knows ISS's future plans. Does ISS plan to realize storage of evidence in DB? Because in current implementation LogEvidence feature almost useless, because it's completely impossible to find needed evidence for desired event, especially in case when number of events have Log Evidence switched on. I wrote about this on enhancements@iss.net, but I don't knoe the fate of that letter. Thanks. --- Best regards, Sergey V. Soldatov. Information security department. tel/fax +7 095 745 89 50 (1613) _______________________________________________ ISSForum mailing list ISSForum@iss.net TO UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, go to https://atla-mm1.iss.net/mailman/listinfo/issforum To contact the ISSForum Moderator, send email to mod-issforum@iss.net The ISSForum mailing list is hosted and managed by Internet Security Systems, 6303 Barfield Road, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 30328.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
_______________________________________________
ISSForum mailing list
ISSForum@iss.net
TO UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, go to
https://atla-mm1.iss.net/mailman/listinfo/issforum
To contact the ISSForum Moderator, send email to mod-issforum@iss.net
The ISSForum mailing list is hosted and managed by Internet Security Systems,
6303 Barfield Road, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 30328.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ISSForum] XPU Updates, Andres Riancho |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ISSForum] LOGDB:LogWithRaw, Sergey V Soldatov |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [ISSForum] LOGDB:LogWithRaw, Jeff |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ISSForum] LOGDB:LogWithRaw, Sergey V Soldatov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |