Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security FullDisclosure
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Full-disclosure] Free Iraq

Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Free Iraq
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:42:34 -0300
Throwaway1,
now that your first argumentative pillar succumbed, you dastardly hide
yourself behind false interpretations on Resolutions 1441 and 687. Not
to mention your silly move, approaching Resolution 678 to the former
ones.

Convenient and biased interpretations! That's what your law
understanding seems to be all about.

That's it, study:
http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/unsc_functions.html

Let's try not to post off-topic (though relevant) stuff here anymore.


Kofi Annan sent you his best regards,




On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Throwaway1@columbus.rr.com
<Throwaway1@columbus.rr.com> wrote:


On Wed, Mar 27, 2008 at 3:56 PM, M.B. Jr. wrote:

there is absolutely no sense in evoking 1990's UN-authorized action...



You can stop right there M.B.
You claim there was no sense in evoking [sic] the UN's authorization of
1990?

That you appear to not understand what the words "Cease Fire" means is your
problem, not mine. Saddam had obligations and failed to meet them. Period.

Neither your understanding nor your approval is required.

==================================================================

On Wed, Mar 27, 2008 at 3:08 PM, "security concern"  wrote:

Sorry to inject some real truth here, guys.
...the then UN Secretary General, Mr. Kofi Annan (referring to the 2003
Iraq invasion) >termed the invasion 'illegal'.


Two points:
a) It's been my experience that people who claim to be speaking "real
truth" are generally as full of crap as a Christmas Goose. It's almost as
cliched and ridiculous as "speaking truth to power".
b) The notion that you would hold forth a man who was up to his neck in the
United Nations "Oil for Food" scandal as an arbiter of legality is absurd
to the point of surrealism. MC Escher himself would feel compelled to roll
his eyes and say; "Niggah Please".


--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft(R)
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail





_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/




-- 
Marcio Barbado, Jr.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>