Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-disclosure] clustering question |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:02:19 -0800 (PST) |
This is security related? Clustered firewall/vpn appliances have to be the same family as they replicate configuration (and sometimes state info) to each other. Usually the size of the appliance is related to user licenses and options like SSL accelleration, so from the hardware perpsective they have to have the same components. [Early '90s' answer] If you're talking about a firewall configuration, as long as the services failover differently sized systems will be fine. The cluster can be full capacity when both are up, and operate in degraded capacity mode with all services running on one server, or if a service fails over to a smaller system it will run in degraded mode. I configured a Dec Seal1 gatekeeper cluster on Digital Ultrix for a west coast bank way back when, they had some services (FTP, SSL) on one server and other services on a another (NTP, SMTP). The clustering software handled service (screend) and virtual IP failover and the configuration files on the shared RAIDset. The systems were equally sized. I haven't seen an application firewall cluster since then. Bill Stout ----- Original Message ---- From: shadow floating <nadengine@googlemail.com> To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 5:35:17 AM Subject: [Full-disclosure] clustering question Hi all, just a simple question when i'm building a cluster, do i have to have all machines in the cluster be exactly the same capacity ,configuration and brand? (cpu power, storage,network connectivity and memory) thank alot regards, _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Full-disclosure] Good afternoon lemmings!, lulz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Full-disclosure] [ MDVSA-2008:050 ] - Updated cups packages fix multiple vulnerabilities, security |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] clustering question, Michael Holstein |
| Next by Thread: | [Full-disclosure] Good afternoon lemmings!, lulz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |