I believe I have contributed greatly to the security community with my post
here. Not only have I denied another 0x41414141 hacker but I have also made
Valdis have to backtrack on his ( as usual) stupid post. I believe Valdis
and Billy O Reilly have alot in common. ( "
"I was wrong. I am not pleased about it at all and I think all Americans
should be concerned about this…What do you want me to do, go over and kiss
the camera?" ).
On Dec 27, 2007 9:05 AM, Elazar Broad <elazarb@earthlink.net> wrote:
After some more analysis by Carsten Eiram @ Secunia, this is NOT
exploitable. I would like to apologize for the hasty post. SecurityFocus,
please update bid 27026 to reflect the fact that at most, this can just
crash the browser.
Elazar
-----Original Message-----
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Sent: Dec 26, 2007 1:28 AM
To: reepex <reepex@gmail.com>
Cc: Elazar Broad <elazarb@earthlink.net>,
full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] AOL YGP Picture Editor YGPPicEdit.dllMultiple
Buffer Overflows
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 21:53:29 CST, reepex said:
How does a bunch of 'A's prove something is exploitable?
If a bunch of A's causes the EIP to end up as x'41414141', it's 95% of
the
way to being an exploit. If it gets you some *other* crash, it's
probably
at least 30% to 40% of the way to an exploit.
Go back and read the analysis of the NTP buffer overflow from a number of
years
back. Truly a classic - they managed to leverage a *one byte* overflow
into
a complete and total rooting of the box.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
