Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-disclosure] .NET REMOTING on port 31337 |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:23:13 -0500 |
Yes, I have seen similar hacks that have come primarily from French hackers. They utilize legitimate network administration tools to "remotely administer" your network for you. GO to that box and run the fport.exe util and handle.exe, or use sysinternals tools to find the app and its stack that were used to open the port. -joel -----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-bounces@lists.grok.org.uk [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@lists.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Simon Smith Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:59 PM To: The Security Community Cc: Full-Disclosure Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] .NET REMOTING on port 31337 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Right, It set off alarms with all of my penetration testers hence why we're researching it. The question I have is, has anyone seen port 31337 respond with the .NET REMOTING banner? Our nmap -A claims that it is .NET REMOTING... just seems weird... Anyone know of any backdoors that do that? The Security Community wrote:
The last time I saw anything on port 31337 (ELEET) it was during a vulnerability assessment. We shut it down and stopped the assessment. Management wouldn't let us investigate, then blew the cover on the assessment a week or two later. It's almost always bad, but you may just have an admin with a stupid sense of humor. 31337 should always throw a red flag. On 9/28/07, Simon Smith <simon@snosoft.com> wrote: Has anyone ever heard of .NET REMOTING running on port 31337? If so, have you ever seen it "legitimate"?
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- -- - - simon - ---------------------- http://www.snosoft.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFG/UDef3Elv1PhzXgRAjZZAJ4mwrJ0WyvGBUznwbrRu4+/JBd0owCdHcgr aKOuZul4pgLcu4H3Aoo1HuU= =X1Ya -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] .NET REMOTING on port 31337, Simon Smith |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox 2.0.0.7 has a very serious calculation bug, Brian Kim |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] .NET REMOTING on port 31337, Fabrizio |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] .NET REMOTING on port 31337, Fabrizio |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |