Re: [Full-disclosure] New term "RDV" is born

I asked you to stop your bullshit you mad man. It is crazy to see so
many anonymous IDs talking to each other and spamming the whole list.

On 9/28/07, worried security <worriedsecurity@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 9/28/07, Troy <gimmespam@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Wouldn't UDV be more appropriate, for unpatched disclosed vulnerability?
> The "R" in RDV means recent. I wouldn't consider a two-month old, but still
> unpatched, vulnerability to be recent, so I wouldn't really be able to call
> it an RDV. I would, however, be able to call it a UDV.
> > Another option would be EDV, for exploitable disclosed vulnerability, or
> even just UV or EV. Why do we need to bring up the point that it's
> disclosed? How could we be discussing an undisclosed vulnerability?
>
>
> Two months is still recently. Think about "In recent history we invaded
> Iraq", "In recent times terrorism has become more prominent".
>
> Five, Ten years can still be classed as recently. Two months, no problem.
>
> Dude, I sat for hours thinking up RDV, give me some credit ;)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter:
> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/