Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-disclosure] defining 0day |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:38:43 -0400 |
You do an excellent job of cross list carbon copy attacking (clcca is new 0day attack terminology), Gadi. While CLCCA is an abbreviation for technical terminology, 0day is simply slang. Since you somewhere state that everyone is an expert in their own delusional little words, perhaps you can find your expertise in figuring out what the word slang means. A bot herder such as yourself might wish to use m-w.com in their internet exploration tools. One would imagine that with all the cardiovascular excursion you gain from typing these long-winded, non-technical, non-important, and otherwise entirely fucking stupid posts that you might start burning weight. Perhaps you should try Clenbuturol. Or if you are committed to weight gain, kerosene might help you get to our ideal weight for you - 21 grammes. Thank you and good night. On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:02:27 -0400 Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Thor (Hammer of God) wrote:For the record, the original term "O-Day" was coined by adyslexicsecurity engineer who listened to too much Harry Belafonte whileworkingall night on a drink of rum. It's true. Really. tOkay. I think we exhausted the different views, and maybe we are now able to come to a conlusion on what we WANT 0day to mean. What do you, as professional, believe 0day should mean, regardless of previous definitions? Obviously, the term has become charged in the past couple of years with the targeted office vulnerabilities attacks, WMF, ANI, etc. We require a term to address these, just as much as we do "unpatched vulnerability" or "fully disclosed vulnerability". What other such descriptions should we consider before proceeding? non-disclosure? Gadi. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
-- Click for a credit repair consultation, raise your FICO score. http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4d7lxd9hH5bRhPxdGavPWdS58qgUb2LsEDsGNIcv7vffNXKo/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] defining bugtraq, jf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Full-disclosure] ERNW Tool Release: CVSS Calculator, mozilla |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] defining 0day, scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] defining 0day, full-disclosure |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |