Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security FullDisclosure
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Full-disclosure] Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 29, Issue 51

Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 29, Issue 51
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:27:06 +0200
Dear List,

Please don't do more paranoia about my mail.
YES, it was my mistake, ok? I'm human after all as you all are too. This
is not my first mistake and it won't be the last for sure either.
I ask for apologies for the inconvenient caused by my mistake.

Cheers,
  Sergio

full-disclosure-request@lists.grok.org.uk wrote:
Send Full-Disclosure mailing list submissions to
      full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
      https://lists.grok.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
      full-disclosure-request@lists.grok.org.uk

You can reach the person managing the list at
      full-disclosure-owner@lists.grok.org.uk

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Full-Disclosure digest..."


Note to digest recipients - when replying to digest posts, please trim your 
post appropriately. Thank you.


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Hash (Peter Besenbruch)
   2. Re: Hash (Tremaine Lea)
   3. Re: Hash (gjgowey@tmo.blackberry.net)
   4. Re: Hash (Tremaine Lea)
   5. Re: Hash (Joey Mengele)
   6. Re: Hash (Dee??n Chakravarth?)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:52:15 -1000
From: Peter Besenbruch <prb@lava.net>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Hash
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Message-ID: <46A95DDF.5050806@lava.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Tremaine Lea wrote:
Sure, it's possible.  Possibly Sergio is lazy.  As he sent it via  
gmail's auth smtp servers and not from webmail, it's just as possible  
it happened in his mail client.

And he still could have, and should have edited it.

And all of that aside, who cares?  We see signatures like that all  
the time on mailing lists.  It's pretty obvious they're useless in  
this context.

Useless in any context. Sigs. like that are very unprofessional. Even if 
I know they are nonsense, such disclaimers come across as mildly bullying.


-- 
Sergio Alvarez
Security, Research & Development
IT Security Consultant
email: shadown@gmail.com


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [Full-disclosure] Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 29, Issue 51, shadown <=