Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Internet Explorer 0day exploit |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:01:26 -0400 |
How does DNS work again, Gadi?
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Dragos Ruiu wrote: > On Tuesday 10 July 2007 08:53, Gadi Evron wrote: >> To paraphrase Guninski, this is still not a 0day. It is a vulnerability >> being disclosed. > > You're being pedantic Gadi. :-) > > We have to accept the term "0day" has passed into > the realm of meaningless nebulousness along with > "hacker" and other misused terms. > > If we are to be pedantic, the original meaning of > 0day is new warez release :-).
I think there is still hope for us buddy, at least when professionals make releases. For example, instead of saying I'm being pedantic on this (which I am), you could (also, in addition) reply and say "yep" or "nope", thus contributing to some discussion. Meaning, we would either make a stand for our profession or at the very least get educated as we go along.
Some people believe the way to reach a "mature industry" is time, others believe it's training or in a more specific fashion, certifications. I don't know what the answer is, and I am sure it isn't terminology (or certifications, hehe).
I do know though, what a 0day is, and don't intend to compromise it for the sake of what the press makes of it. It's a strong term and concept which shouldn't be abused. That or we can decide on a new term for what 0day used to mean. How about "blubla"?
>From professionals, we can expect good language and for their work to speak for them. We shouldn't compromise on silly things like what 0day means.
Maybe I will give this up next year, but for now, advisories named "0day" have disapeared lately. Maybe peer pressure does have some effect.
The above is over-thinking and some could consider it very silly, but for now, I believe in it. It's just like I resent those among consultants who conduct themselves in a fashion that makes me ashamed of my profession, as a far-off analogy.
> cheers, > --dr > > -- > World Security Pros. Cutting Edge Training, Tools, and Techniques > Tokyo, Japan November 29/30 - 2007 http://pacsec.jp > pgpkey http://dragos.com/ kyxpgp >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Full-disclosure] Fast HTTP Auth Scanner, Amichai Teumim |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Full-disclosure] [CAID 35527]: CA Message Queuing (CAM / CAFT) Buffer Overflow Vulnerability, Williams, James K |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Internet Explorer 0day exploit, Anupam Mishra |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Internet Explorer 0day exploit, Paul Szabo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |