Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security FullDisclosure
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Full-disclosure] [Amsn-devel] aMSN <= 0.96 remote DoS vulnerability

Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] [Amsn-devel] aMSN <= 0.96 remote DoS vulnerability
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:32:35 -0400
Hi,
 
I'm a developer and admin of the aMSN project, someone just sent me this link 
( http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-April/053912.html ).
 
I just grepped in the source code and that port (31337) is not used by aMSN, it 
could be a port used for a 
profile (as a locking system), in which case the port is randomly chosen each 
time, so this is probably just a 
fluke, he found the port of his current aMSN instance and used it. 
 
As I don't have more info, I can't really test this bug and find the real cause 
and fix it, so it would be nice 
to have more info about this. 
 
Seeing how the user replied on the "Vendor contacted?" tag, I wonder if I can 
get any more info on this matter.
 
Thanks,
KaKaRoTo

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>