Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your network? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:07:11 -0800 |
Gadi, It looks like I was confused, this actually affected AIX and Linux in 1994: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/458/info http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-1994-09.html Oliver -----Original Message----- From: Gadi Evron [mailto:ge@linuxbox.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 1:46 AM To: Oliver Friedrichs Cc: bugtraq@securityfocus.com; full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk Subject: RE: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your network? On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Oliver Friedrichs wrote:
Am I missing something? This vulnerability is close to 10 years old. It was in one of the first versions of Solaris after Sun moved off of the SunOS BSD platform and over to SysV. It has specifically to do with how arguments are processed via getopt() if I recall correctly.
Hey Oliver! :) Well than, I guess it just became new again. And to be honest, I have to agree with a previous poster and suspect (only suspect) it could somehow be a backdoor rather than a bug. The reason why this vulnerability is so critical is the number of networks and organizations which rely on Solaris for critical production servers, as well as use telnet for internal communication on their LAN (now how smart is that? I'd rather use telnet on the Internet than on a local LAN). Further, there are quite a few third party appliances (some infrastructure back-end) that can not easily be patched running on Solaris (forget fuzzing or VA, people never even NMAP appliances they buy). I am unsure of how long we will see this in to-do items of corporate security teams around the world, but I am sure Sun's /8 is getting a lot of action recently.
Oliver
Gadi.
-----Original Message----- From: Gadi Evron [mailto:ge@linuxbox.org] Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 10:01 PM To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk Subject: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your network? Johannes Ullrich from the SANS ISC sent this to me and then I saw it on the DSHIELD list: ---- If you run Solaris, please check if you got telnet enabled NOW. If
you
can, block port 23 at your perimeter. There is a fairly trivial
Solaris telnet 0-day.
telnet -l "-froot" [hostname]
will give you root on many Solaris systems with default installs
We are still testing. Please use our contact form at
https://isc.sans.org/contact.html
if you have any details about the use of this exploit.
----
You mean they still use telnet?!
Update from HD Moore:
"but this bug isnt -froot, its -fanythingbutroot =P"
On the exploits@ mailing list and on DSHIELD this vulnerability was
verified as real.
If Sun doesn't yet block port 23/tcp incoming on their /8, I'd make it
a strong suggestion.
Anyone else running Solaris?
Gadi.
| Previous by Date: | [Full-disclosure] UPDATE: [ GLSA 200611-05 ] Netkit FTP Server: Privilege escalation, Raphael Marichez |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your network?, Gadi Evron |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your network?, Gadi Evron |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your network?, Gadi Evron |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |