Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security FullDisclosure
[Top] [All Lists]

[Full-disclosure] FW: [Fwd: Re[2]: Fun with event logs (semi-offtopic)]

Subject: [Full-disclosure] FW: [Fwd: Re[2]: Fun with event logs (semi-offtopic)]
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:10:35 +0000
Dear 3APA3A,

Correct me if i am wrong, but it looks like it's documented behavior of the 
event viewer.
This is what i found:

Note that there is no way to log a string that contains %n, where n is an 
integer value. This syntax is used in IPv6 addresses, so it is a problem to 
log an event message that contains an IPv6 address. For example, if the 
message text contains %1, the event viewer treats it as an insertion string. 
If the string contains %%1, the event viewer literally uses %%1.

Source:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa363679.aspx

Greetz,
B

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:       Re[2]: [Full-disclosure] Fun with event logs (semi-offtopic)
Date:  Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:13:14 +0300
From:  3APA3A <3APA3A@SECURITY.NNOV.RU>
Reply-To:      3APA3A <3APA3A@SECURITY.NNOV.RU>
Organization:  http://www.security.nnov.ru
To:    Michele Cicciotti <mc@khamsa.net>
CC:    full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@securityfocus.com
References:    <20061221122536.6AA7A1D8F7C@supertolla.itapac.net> 
<20061221152104.A96731D8F79@supertolla.itapac.net>



Dear Michele Cicciotti,

--Thursday, December 21, 2006, 6:20:54 PM, you wrote to 
full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk:

There  is  interesting  thing  with  event  logging on Windows. The only
security  aspect  of  it  is  event log record tampering and performance
degradation,  but  it may become sensitive is some 3rd party software is
used for automated event log analysis.

MC> I doubt this. The event logs don't contain the actual formatted
MC> string, because the template string is localized and only retrieved
MC> when the entry is displayed - what is logged is just a message id
MC> and the string inserts (see documentation for EVENTLOGRECORD).
MC> FormatMessage (which is used to build the full message to display to
MC> the user) isn't the culprit, either, because it doesn't operate
MC> recursively (that would have bizarre consequences, since

As  I  wrote,  my message is semi-offtopic, because it's more fun than
any  security  vulnerability  here.

Yes,  probably  this  bug  only  affects  event  viewer  itself. I don't
understand  how  and why Microsoft achieved this effect in event viewer,
which  is,  by  the  way,  security tool, and if it's hard for different
vendor  to  make  same  mistake. It doesn't look like Easter egg, but if
FormatMessage  does  not recursion it needs to be specially coded and it
does  nothing  except this bug. Bug, that needs to be specially coded is
new funny bug category, isn't it?

--
~/ZARAZA
http://www.security.nnov.ru/



_________________________________________________________________
The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden Globes is here.  Get all the scoop. 
http://tv.msn.com/tv/globes2007/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Full-disclosure] FW: [Fwd: Re[2]: Fun with event logs (semi-offtopic)], BART. .... <=