Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-disclosure] RFID enabled e-passport skimming proof of concept code released (RFIDIOt) |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:19:09 +0000 |
Michael Holstein wrote:
That article focuses on Dutch passports, but in the US it's essentially the same.The Passport numbera 10 digit number (I don't know where they start, but it certainly wasn't 0000000001).
If they're sequential, we only need to know where they start once the chips are installed, assuming you get a new passport number when you renew (as you do in th UK).
The Date Of Birth of the holderabout 32,000 possibilities (assuming < 90yrs old)The Expiry Date of the PassportPassports are vaild for 10 years (for an adult in the US), and expiration is just MM/YYYY .. so that's only 120 possibilities.
Currently even less, since, again, it will expire 10 years from the date chips were first installed, so here in the UK there is only one valid year so far, so only 12 possibilities.
A very small dictionary for "brute force" indeed, and I'd be happy to code such a routine.
Thanks for the offer, but I'm already pretty much there... It'll be in the next release... :)
Does anyone know if the chips in the latest passports (USA issue) prevent this sort of thing, or can you try keys as fast as the RF interface will permit?
There is nothing in the standard to require anti-bruteforcing mechanisms such as timing backoffs etc., and although I haven't done exhaustive tests on this, trying multiple wrong keys doesn't seem to have any bad effect on a UK passport. Using my python library I get about 3 tries per second, but I expect that speed could be improved... cheers, Adam -- Adam Laurie Tel: +44 (0) 1304 814800 The Bunker Secure Hosting Ltd. Fax: +44 (0) 1304 814899 Ash Radar Station http://www.thebunker.net Marshborough Road Sandwich mailto:adam@thebunker.net Kent CT13 0PL UNITED KINGDOM PGP key on keyservers _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Full-disclosure] Metasploit Framework 2.7 Released, H D Moore |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] RFID enabled e-passport skimming proof of concept code released (RFIDIOt), Adam Laurie |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] RFID enabled e-passport skimming proof of concept code released (RFIDIOt), Michael Holstein |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] RFID enabled e-passport skimming proof of concept code released (RFIDIOt), Adam Laurie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |