Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security FullDisclosure
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability automation and Botnet "solutions" I

Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability automation and Botnet "solutions" I expect to see this year
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:57:02 +0200
*. Gadi Intelligence (very limited)


On 10/26/06, cdejrhymeswithgay@hush.com <cdejrhymeswithgay@hush.com> wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1



On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:52:58 -0500 Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org>
wrote:
>So, what I am going to talk about... A tad bit of history on
>vulnerabilities and their use on the Internet, and then, what we
>are going
>to see on corporate, ISP and Internet security relating to botnets

>this
>coming year.
>
>Vulnerabilities don't exist for the sake of vulnerabilities. They
>are used
>for something, they are a tool. Botnets are much the same, using
>vulnerabilities on the next layer.
>
>This past year we have seen how disclosed vulnerabilities, patched
>vulnerabilities and 0days have been utilized by automated kits. An
>inter-linked system of websites which download malicious code
>(update the
>kits), try to infect millions of users from just a couple dozen
>main hubs,
>and react to the environment.
>If a certain vulnerability is seen to be more successful on
>certain OS
>types or if one is found to not work, the kit will be fixed
>accordingly
>and distributed. Often immediately after a patch Tuesday, likely
>that same
>Friday evening.
>
>This way, income can be maximized with the number of infections,
>data
>stolen and thus ROI. Both from the expected response time of the
>vendors
>as well as how many victims can be reached in that window.
>
>One such kit is Webattacker, which has recently been getting more
>known in
>public circles.
>
>Where we are
>
>That does it, botnets are mainstream. People did not yet
>understand the
>idea that software vulnerabilities facilitate an attack (=are not
>the
>attack) and botnets facilitate much the same, only on a different
>level. I
>will discuss that further after what interests everybody.
>
>Solutions in the coming year!
>
>First, many products in the industry have been implemented
>successfully in
>the past, just as solutions of necessity, not "products". Some
>were
>successful, some failed. Some (services) have been supplied to the

>rich
>and connected, some haven't.
>Botnets are now main-stream, which means other lesser beings and
>corporations want these services. They want to be protected in a
>hostile
>world. They realize the Internet is not a safe place, and plan
>accordingly.
>
>Services we will see more and more of:
>*. Intelligence (very limited), showing IP addresses for botnet
>command
>and control (C&C) servers, which your computers may be connecting
>to
>(i.e. compromised).
>*. Intelligence (very limited), showing IP addresses that you
>control
>which show in spam (meaning compromised hosts) or show in other
>ways in
>botnet data being collected. Mostly, this is spam-oriented and the

>rest of
>the intelligence is barely noticeable as of yet.
>*. Intelligence (very limited) on the millions on millions of
>credentials
>(for sites, credit cards, banks, eCommerce systems, etc.) and
>identities
>being stolen every single day by massive phishing man-in-the-
>middle trojan
>horses.
>*. Intelligence (very limited) other black listing services.
>
>In the past, a limited version of these services was provided, but

>very
>secretly, and at a very high cost.
>
>Products:
>
>Botnet products on the network can either detect internal problems

>(such
>as bots on the corporate or ISP network or the spreading of
>infections) or
>external problems (such as C&C servers or attacks from the world).

>These
>can be based on behavior or intelligence.
>
>Solutions, which we discussed in the past and are now going to
>manifest:
>
>Intelligence-based (until now only supplied by select groups to
>select
>groups) -
>*. Known bad IPs. Etc. Much like in spam, only for other realms.
>*. Known bad URLs or domain names. Etc. Much like in spam, only
>for other
>realms.
>
>Detection -
>*. IDS approach (decent but not even close to cutting it),
>*. DNS monitoring approach (very cool, but is just one approach in

>a
>layered solution).
>*. Netflow approach (proven for years now, only one approach,
>however
>useful, which is growing more limited every day).
>
>Respond and quarantine -
>*. Walled garden approach (close off/limit suspicious or confirmed
>compromised computers until they clean themselves. NOt successful
>in
>current solutions, shows promise).
>*. Try to fix the situation remotely (solve the vulnerabilities,
>etc. ahead of time or remove after the fact).
>
>There are several others, but these are the main ones describing
>the 10 or
>so products we are about to see (all of which are already
>available
>publicly as open source, privately developed tools or unsuccessful
>solutions due to lack of client awareness and interest).
>
>QoS, virtualization and half decent intelligence gathering will
>come
>next. Other solutions I will not waste breath speaking of right
>now, they
>will appear for public consumption once the effectiveness of the
>solutions
>above (or the better ones there) is done to dust.
>
>What's next?
>
>Decent, real decent, intelligence, and support response tools to
>mitigate
>what you find in conjunction with a response team trained to deal
>with
>thousands of real incidents rather than mark check-lists on a
>couple an
>hour to a couple a month. That's simply not being aware of what's
>happening in your network.
>Many of the CERTs and SOCs are very trained and high quality, they

>are not
>equipped or don't see what they need to react to nor in most cases

>are
>built to deal with this threat.
>
>What's never going to happen?
>
>With security done right, on a wide-scale, with a decent systems
>design,
>network, policy, monitoring and responce - a lot can be done and
>0days can
>also be avoided, even (and especially) with business concerns
>being put
>first.
>
>Gadi Evron,
>ge@linuxbox.org.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

If Hitler was alive and a hacker, do you think your box would be
working, Gadi?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify
Version: Hush 2.5

wpwEAQECAAYFAkVAxgAACgkQsGS6s78KOsXp5gP8CIlcHIyTcYj8wDx+LMRuHnrIsCO2
N6ELTIQfGdwLBR+o57u41PHmurUdwcwiXChZ4W2Qz/p1NO+Js7rXETMYHRUW/hwv0Aos
KZN7RpCFH3PsS9fnPKljBEaWTDG6q+IoBvKI/+6V6M+s0jftHsPp6I6w9eiWf9TQ9tp7
tF9QnSg=
=WL6I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account required http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480

Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail
https://www.hushssl.com?l=485

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/




-- smile tomorrow will be worse
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>