Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security FullDisclosure
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Full-disclosure] Putty Proxy login/password discolsure....

Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Putty Proxy login/password discolsure....
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:47:30 -0300
Exactly. If you´ve managed to lost your root password, deal with the
karma, does not make the system insecure by design with a "linux single"
feature. 

Not that a lot of users don´t forget their passwords anyway.


On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 23:57:15 +0530
Raj Mathur <raju@linux-delhi.org> wrote:

RM> On Wednesday 25 October 2006 23:14, cardoso wrote:
RM> > Exactly. A few years ago I used to deal with linux fanboys showing
RM> > them the cute trick of "linux single" at boot time. After a few
RM> > hours begging for the admin password, I teached the trick and they
RM> > usually stopped the brag about how security Linux was.
RM> 
RM> Can't do that in most modern distributions today -- they're configured 
RM> to ask for root password before they give a single-user shell.
RM> 
RM> Not that there aren't other ways around that restriction...
RM> 
RM> -- Raju
RM> 
RM> >
RM> >
RM> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:34:49 -0500
RM> > Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> wrote:
RM> >
RM> > PS> --On Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:24:11 -0400
RM> > mflaschen3@mail.gatech.edu PS> wrote:
RM> > PS>
RM> > PS> > Windows offers no security against local users.  It is
RM> > trivial to boot to PS> > a program like ERD Commander and replace
RM> > admin passwords.  On the other PS> > hand, PuTTy is meant to
RM> > protect against everyone; that's why it doesn't PS> > allow saved
RM> > passwords.  Thus, this seems like a vulnerability to me. PS> >
RM> > PS> Unix offers no security against local users either.  If I can
RM> > sit at the PS> console, I can login in single user mode, mount the
RM> > drives rw and edit PS> /etc/passwd all day.
RM> > PS>
RM> > PS> Furthermore, I can take any hard drive, with any file system on
RM> > it, and PS> with the right tools I can read everything on the
RM> > drive, even deleted stuff. PS>
RM> > PS> So what's your point?  That when you own the box you own the
RM> > box? PS>
RM> > PS> If you first have to own the box to get to the information,
RM> > then it's not a PS> vulnerability.  It's not best practice, but
RM> > it's not a vulnerability. PS>
RM> 
RM> -- 
RM> Raj Mathur            raju@kandalaya.org   http://kandalaya.org/
RM>        GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5  0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F
RM>                       It is the mind that moves
RM> 
RM> _______________________________________________
RM> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
RM> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
RM> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
RM> 

-------------------------------------------------------------
Carlos Cardoso
http://www.carloscardoso.com <== blog semi-pessoal
http://www.contraditorium.com <== ProBlogging e cultura digital

"You lost today, kid. But that doesn't mean you have to like it"

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>