Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Backdooring PDF Files |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:52:51 +0000 |
I installed 7.0.8 (latest version) for testing.
If the document is loaded from the browser you receive no warning. v7.0.8 seems to warn the user if the document is loaded from the desktop.
I think this has to do with different Adobe contexts.
-- David Kierznowski
I have tested both of the examples and no warning boxes are showing. It seams that everybody is getting different results. Interesting!
On 9/13/06, Juha-Matti Laurio <juha-matti.laurio@netti.fi> wrote: > Proof of Concept for example 1 (backdoored1.pdf) opened with Adobe Reader 7.0.8 > (i.e. no browser plug-in used) issued a Security Warning dialog box: > > "The document is trying to conenct to the site: > http://www.google.com/owned.html > > If you trust the site click "Allow", otherwise click "Block"." > > Option Remember my action is in use as well. > > When clicking "Allow" this Google page was opened in MSIE (in fact FF is my default browser, however). > > Am I missing something related to differences between Reader plug-in and Reader application? > > - Juha-Matti > > > David Kierznowski <david.kierznowski@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Recently, there has been alot of hype involving backdooring various > > web technologies. pdp (arcitect) has done alot of work centered around > > this area. > > > > I saw Jeremiah Grossman mention PDF's being "BAD", however, I was > > unable to easily locate any practical reasons as to why. I decided to > > investigate this a little further. > > > > This article discusses two possible backdoor techniques for Adobe > > Acrabat Reader and Professional. It includes proof of concept code and > > backdoored PDF documents. > > > > The article can be found here: > > http://michaeldaw.org/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
-- pdp (architect) http://www.gnucitizen.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is sponsored by: Norwich University
http://www.msia.norwich.edu/secfocus ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Backdooring PDF Files, pdp (architect) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this., Nick FitzGerald |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Backdooring PDF Files, pdp (architect) |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Backdooring PDF Files, Hugo Francisco González Robledo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |