Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security FullDisclosure
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Full-disclosure] scanning

Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] scanning
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 13:26:05 +0800
On 6/2/06, Simon Smith <simon@snosoft.com> wrote:
Guys,
    It is not illegal to port-scan a target IP with or without
authorization. It would be impossible to prosecute someone because they
portscanned you. Hell, it would be near impossible to prosecute someone
who ran nessus against you but never penetrated your systems. From
expereince, the FBI only takes interest in crimes that cause roughly
$50,000.00 in damage or more. If you are below that mark or if they are
too busy... you won't get jack unless you pay for it.



David Alanis wrote:
>> Depends on the Jurisdiction... However If I found out that it was my
>> site, I'd have to debate on whether or not to sue your ass... But that's
>> just me...
>>
>
> You would not sue anyone. Thats just saying that you would sue anyone under 
the sun trying to ping or go after some bot trying to scan your Apache box for IIS 
5 vulnerabilities. My point is, even if you did realize someone was actively 
scanning your host, there would be nothing you could do, I think it would be too 
time consuming. Yet your question still stands. Is it legal or illegal?
>
> David
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: full-disclosure-bounces@lists.grok.org.uk
>> [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@lists.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of
>> Nightfall Nightfall
>> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 7:54 PM
>> To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
>> Subject: [Full-disclosure] scanning
>>
>>
>> Is it illegal if I perform a vulnerability scan on a site without
>> permission from the owner? How about a simple port scan? thanks..
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
>
>
> "Great Spirits Have Always Encountered Violent Opposition From Mediocre 
Minds" - Einstein
>
> "Cuanta estupidez en tan poco cerebro!"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>




BullGuard Anti-virus has scanned this e-mail and found it clean. Try BullGuard for free: www.bullguard.com


_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

I brought up this topic coz of these incident
-http://www.pinoytechblog.com/archives/tridel-settles-with-inq7net-on-vulnerability-test-suit
.
I was wondering if they were justified in suing the perpetrator who
did the vulnerability scan on their network.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>