Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security FullDisclosure
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Full-disclosure] What is wrong with schools these days?

Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] What is wrong with schools these days?
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 17:39:09 -0500
Pavel Kankovsky wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Paul Schmehl wrote:

We haven't had a Windows box hacked in a long time.

Does it include Windoze boxes possesed by malware? Such a box is not hacked in a strict sense but the difference is almost irrelevant (esp. when backdoors have become a standard feature of malware).

I have no idea how you would put a number on that, because the way the AV software reports an "infection" is biased to inflate the numbers. If, for example, I go to a webiste, and while I'm there an exploit attempts to run but the AV software prevents it from running, it will report an "infection". Yet the box was never infected. The AV prevented the exploit from completing successfully.

If I get a virus through email (extremely unlikely here), and I click on the attachment deliberately trying to get it to run, and the AV software stops it, but reports an infection, is that an infection? Or simply a detection and prevention?

Does adware count? If so, which ones? Which viruses would count as "hacks"? And what actually counts as a hack? A detection/prevention? Or only actual infections?

If you point is to say that Windows is far more susceptible to attack, then that's a given.

--
Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>