Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: [Full-disclosure] What is wrong with schools these days? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:00:22 -0700 |
You know, having made a few NTexploit lists in the past, I wanted to make the point the M$ was less secure. Unfortunately the facts were against me. Two IIS 6.0 vulnerabilities reported from 2003-2006 http://secunia.com/product/1438/ Twenty-eight Apache 2.0 vulnerabilities reported from 2003-2006 http://secunia.com/product/73/ Paul is right. I would never suggest a Windows admin use UNIX, or visa-versa. A product is only as secure as it's configured. Bill Stout www.greenborder.com -----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-bounces@lists.grok.org.uk [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@lists.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Paul Schmehl Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 10:27 AM To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] What is wrong with schools these days? CrYpTiC MauleR wrote:
All you had to say was Microsoft =oP
That's hilarious. The number one defaced website OS is Linux. (See Zone-H.org if you don't believe me.) The number one problem I have here is unix boxes. You know why? Because a lot of open-source bozos run around claiming unix is more secure than Windows. So a lot of clueless people think that, if they just set up a RedHat box, they won't have anything to worry about. Ask them what that little red ball with the X in it is - you know - the one flashing up there in the taskbar- and they'll say I dunno. No OS is secure by default. No OS can remain secure if it's not properly configured and maintained. Look at your box right now. How many of you have inetd or xinetd running? Why? What services does it provide that you need? Do you even know what chargen or rpc.statd is? If not, why are they running (if they are)? How many of you have a workstation running with more than just ssh enabled and *no* firewall running? You name the OS, and I can tell you of at least one incident of hacking. We haven't had a Windows box hacked in a long time. The last five were two Macs and three RedHat boxes. Does that mean Macs and RedHat are insecure? NO! It means, until the general public understands the problem and knows what the solution is, hacking will continue apace with no sign of letting up. The real problem is ignorance. -- Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] What is wrong with schools these days?, bart.lansing |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] What is wrong with schools these days?, Bipin Gautam |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] What is wrong with schools these days?, Bipin Gautam |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] What is wrong with schools these days?, Michael Holstein |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |