-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Yeah, I do actually, but due to the nature of the company that I work
for, I'm not actually able to disclose any of that information.
I'm also legally not allowed to disclose any vulnerabilities
publicly, as per my contract of employment.
Most the people on this list and a few others are already aware of
those factors, but I guess I couldn't expect someone of your l33tness
to comprehend that.
Maybe one day when you get a real job, and finish school, and if
you're lucky enough, your prospective employer will have no idea who
n3td3v is. You may even understand that certain
factors change when you get a real job, I just hope that for your
sake one day you realize the damage that you are doing to your name
in the industry.
xyberpix
Blog: http://blogs.securiteam.com
On 29 Mar 2006, at 23:18, n3td3v wrote:
Well actually breaking into systems and showing the result to
Google Yahoo etc sure is a bigger buzz than blogging about "current
issues" within the media that you currently blog about. Wheres your
hacker stories of breaking into systems, wheres your unique/
original posts that haven't been seen before in public? I
throughout the the years have been none stop telling everyone of my
war stories of whats been happening behind the scenes at the Yahoo
security community. I mean, which scene do you belong to, apart
from some guy who reads FD and then blogs about whatever is on the
list. Don't you have your own stuff thats original/unique?
On 3/29/06, xyberpix <xyberpix@xyberpix.com> wrote: -----BEGIN PGP
SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahaha.
To live in your world must be so much fun.
xyberpix
Blog: http://blogs.securiteam.com
On 29 Mar 2006, at 22:20, n3td3v wrote:
> And of course, you want to advertise that securiteam.com let you
> setup a blog on their domain because they felt sorry for you. I
> believe theres a e-mail link on the securiteam.com site for anyone
> to ask for a blog, its nothing special. How many corporate systems
> and networks have you broken into, just as I thought...none.
>
> On 3/29/06, xyberpix <xyberpix@xyberpix.com> wrote: -----BEGIN PGP
> SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Seriously, this list was better with a certain someone not on it,
can
> we please go back to that way of life again?
>
> xyberpix
>
> Blog: http://blogs.securiteam.com
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
>
> iD8DBQFEKvaQ2VKEoIQBZwkRAtzKAKC1Nm61nKmI+kvMO8xdWGfS3stTewCgknu/
> lmv5iUrwWtmo9VmqUH9VaT4=
> =ohry
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFEKwLO2VKEoIQBZwkRAhOBAJoCGou8RI/hWUqNpbcsSVZiHPhHaQCeKvI+
VQpWU9/mpZoC1LsiZl+xv/k=
=hFF7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFEKwnB2VKEoIQBZwkRAn4KAJ9c5kzK9moPBOow88A2LKGV26huigCgy6vc
4EoTjG44MUYJHjcGmodyb/U=
=ly16
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
