Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Question about Mac OS X 10.4 Security |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:14:30 -0600 |
On 2/28/06, Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> wrote: <snip>
Still, the ignorance of Mac users, who believe their platform is somehow magically "secure" will contribute to the problem. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
I am sorry, Paul, but I have to take you up on this, especially with your tendency of generalizing everything. I have used *nix in the past, for all my network and security tools, until MacOSX presented itself as an opportunity for migration, when I had a need for a new laptop (over two years ago). At that time the 2.6 kernel and available modules weren't up to the tasks of the latest hardware capabilities of x86 laptops, so - on an advice from a friend of mine - I have tried an iBook. I have been able to compile and port all my tools just fine, especially with the help of the underlying "like-BSD" infrastructure (long live fink and Darwin-ports). All I can tell you is that - ever since - I never looked back at other choices (w/the exception of Windows, which was never considered among choices, anyway, due to limitations in cygwin, not talking about the many other obvious reasons for the OS, itself ;)), and have recently got myself the latest still-PPC Powerbook, which just confirmed the rightness of the original migration. As a repository of security and network tools, I have thrown at this baby everything I can possible think of, and still haven't found a way to break it ... ... so the Mac users are not [only] the bunch of idiots/ignorants whom you tend to describe - I would just invite you to attend a blackhat or shmoocon, or even SANS or Cisco networkers, and let me know how many Mac users you can count there ... and then ask yourself why ... but then, again, I may be wrong ;> Stef _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Question about Mac OS X 10.4 Security, KF (lists) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] reduction of brute force login attempts via SSH through iptables --hashlimit, Matthijs van Otterdijk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Question about Mac OS X 10.4 Security, KF (lists) |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Question about Mac OS X 10.4 Security, Mike Owen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |