Re: [Full-disclosure] Question about Mac OS X 10.4 Security

Mac's have always held the distinction of being more secure by, among other
things, not being a target.  -- Due to the lack of extensive use, virus and
mal ware writers have ignored taking the time to write virus for Macs.

Simple philosophy -  Why climb the wall , when you can walk through the
door.  

Windows is easier and more prolific, until that changes, we are not going to
see major attacks on the mac platform.

JMHO


On 2/28/06 12:04 AM, "Ferdinand Klinzer" <Klinzer@gmx.de> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hey Guys,
>
> What you think about the latest Mac OS X 10.4.x Security flaws?
> I think it will go fast then it goes like Windows Systems more and
> more Trojan Horse and other security bugs...
>
> I only want make a thread about what you think?
>
> Cheers
>
> Ferdinand 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
>
> iD8DBQFEBAQoivpgT1glX4cRAow2AJ4xcl8to6Vtzb/mAccqjSG0WuE1jwCeJpeV
> OKrrslBaBNxiV1GcLHgvcPU=
> =bNj4
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

-- 
Stephen Johnson
The Lone Coder

http://www.ouradoptionblog.com
*Join us on our adoption journey*

stephen@thelonecoder.com
http://www.thelonecoder.com

*Continuing the struggle against bad code*
--


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/