Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-disclosure] PC Firewall Choices |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:57:36 +0100 |
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:28:51AM +0000, Juliao Duartenn wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 23:33 -0500, greybrimstone@aim.com wrote:Thats assuming that malware isn't being designed for that firewall. I'm sure you already know that software is software regardless of the hardware that it is running on. Likewise a vulnerability is still a vulnerability... I suppose you could r/o the system... but you need to write the confs somewhere right? -AdrielConfiguration on a hardware firewall is usually a pretty stable thing - you don't go around opening ports at random every day, now do you? Most modern {linux|bsd} firewall implementations can now run from a read-only device, namely CD-ROM, and also write their configuration to a removable device that you can manually set RW or RO - floppy, USB pen, etc. Of course, since most implementations mount parts of the filesystem into RAM, you're still vulnerable to attacks, they are merely non-permanent, if you reboot you are clean again, albeit with the original hole still present, i'd say. There are, of course, solutions for that too, but I still haven't seen one that really works - meaning that it can detect and prevent tampering in real-time. The best thing I can remember is running tripwire against a RO database on CD, but that can still be tampered with. Any thoughts?
Well, if someone manages to get access to the kernel (don't forget that
root has such access), any program on the system can be made to do
pretty much anything - in particular, tripwire can be made to report
that all is well.
The easy solution involves using a recent kernel that has no known or
suspected vulnerabilities. Some intrusion detection - like tripwire -
might be valuable, but there is a limit to that.
Joachim
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Startup company, Dude VanWinkle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Full-disclosure] Google's Blogger.com classic HTTP response splitting vulnerability, Meder Kydyraliev |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] PC Firewall Choices, Juliao Duartenn |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] PC Firewall Choices, greybrimstone |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |