Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security FullDisclosure
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Full-disclosure] complaints about the governemnt spying!

Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] complaints about the governemnt spying!
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:56:41 -0600
--On December 29, 2005 2:05:23 PM -0500 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 08:04:43 CST, Leif Ericksen said:
There are those laws that are direct and clear cut, and there are the
ones that takes an act of congress to decide what is legal or not.  ;)

And then there are those you're not allowed to even *see*. In Gilmore v. Ashcroft, the Department of Justice finally consented to allow a *judge* with a security clearance to see the text of the law, but Gilmore and his attorneys are still denied access to what the law says.

That's a silly misrepresentation of the facts of the case. There *is* no law requiring the presentation of ID at an airport. There *is* a law that makes it illegal to hijack a plane, and there *are* security directives, issued by the FAA, which define the means and methods by which the law will be enforced. Among those is the requirement to show ID upon request. The security directives are secret because you don't show your hand to the enemy (except if you work for the New York Times.)


Mr. Gilmore, who is an activist civil libertarian, deliberately entered an airport without an form of ID, then refused to produce ID when requested. When he was then asked to undergo a more thorough screening, he refused that as well. He was then arrested and removed from the airport.

Every airport has signs everywhere instructing you to provide a photo ID. Only someone who was deliberately trying to disrupt the system would enter an airport with ID, refuse to show ID, refuse a thorough screening, and then complain when they were arrested - after which they file a lawsuit for large money damages.

So, while everybody eagerly portrays Mr. Gilmore as an innocent citizen just trying to about his daily life, he was far from it, knew when he entered the airport he was going to cause trouble, deliberately chose to do so anyway and now whines about his rights being violated.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>