Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Report to Recipient(s) |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:27:16 -0700 |
On 11/30/05, Michael Holstein <michael.holstein@csuohio.edu> wrote:
Only those with broken AV software, since that line is not the EICAR test string, according to the definition of the EICAR test string.As many have pointed out, I realize it's supposed to be an attachment : http://www.eicar.org/anti_virus_test_file.htm but I've encountered plenty of broken A/V implementations that didn't care *where* in the message it was.
Please correct me if I am wrong:
From what little I know, AV companies do not have 5 engines for
detection, they have 1. Symantecs AV for SMTP, SAV, etc all use the same detection engine. They just have different ways of parsing the data (among other features). With the advent of HTML emails, most av engines will check the body of your emails. Even if some engines miss it, thats still a _really_ good idea, thanks for sharing =P -JP "X5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*" -Michael Holstein _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Clever crooks can foil wiretaps, security flaw in tap technology, Stan Bubrouski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Clever crooks can foil wiretaps, security flaw in tap technology, Michael Holstein |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Report to Recipient(s), Michael Holstein |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Report to Recipient(s), Morning Wood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |