Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Google Talk cleartext credentials in process memory |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:49:03 +0100 |
Nasko Oskov wrote:
If you want to protect the credentials in memory from dumps that go to Microsoft, why not use CryptProtectMemory() instead of home-grown obfuscation? This function encrypts the memory with a key that changes over reboots, so even if you send a dump to MS, they wouldn't know how to decrypt it.
Yes, it is possible. regards, js _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Google Talk cleartext credentials in process memory, Nasko Oskov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Fwd: [OTO-54919]: Re: [Full-disclosure] Paypal phishing attempt], Kyle Lutze |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Google Talk cleartext credentials in process memory, Nasko Oskov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Google Talk cleartext credentials in process memory, Georgi Guninski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |