Re: [Full-disclosure] Return of the Phrack High Council

yeah, that was a slight accident, the first one I composed only went to 
him since I didn't hit reply-all, and didn't fully edit the second one. :/

ok, so I'm a bit of a hypocrite sometimes too. Also, I didn't mean to 
say wikipedia's definition was a way to go, I was just using that to 
show my reason without having to put it all in

Kyle

Mike Klein wrote:
> And yet you quoted netdev's entire email for no good reason 
> whatsoever...another breach of supposed netiquette.
>
> Top vs. bottom posting is a bunch of crap. With 20 years experience in 
> computing I have yet to see consensus on this issue....regardless of 
> wikipedia definition.
>
> I subscribe to numerous mail lists/etc. and far prefer top posts...less 
> scrolling to bottom too see what is being said. If people snipped orig 
> post than bottom posting would <possibly> be preferrable...but quite 
> often this isn't the case...and very often extremely verbose crap like 
> images/etc. (dammit' mom get with the program) is often left in as well.
>
> mike klein
>
> Kyle Lutze wrote:
>
> > now, can't you post correctly in a mailing list? 
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/top_posting I mean come on, a computer 
> > guru not knowing about that?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/