Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security FullDisclosure
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Full-disclosure] CORE-Impact license bypass

Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] CORE-Impact license bypass
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:04:47 +0100
Bernhard Mueller wrote:
Exibar wrote:

     I didn't mean to imply that the consultants create their own exploits,
not many I know could even begin to do that, only a couple are talented
enough to do just that.  Even for those very few, it's just not feasable
from a time perspective.  Much quick and cost effective to use what's out
there.



so what use is a pentest if the consultant isn't even talented enough to
find / create exploits for unknown vulnerabilities?
any average admin can install and run an automatic security scanner.
furthermore, a common nessus report contains 99% useless garbage.


A good pentester will not just hand over a Nessus (or ItsStillShit, CANVAS,..) report. The results of a Nessus scan (as with Nmap, firewalk, document grinding, google searches, *plus* the results of all the manual scouting about that's done) are data that need to be analysed and placed in context by the pentester.

A pentester who hands over nothing but an automated report, isn't.
A pentester who doesn't bother using Nessus is either extraordinarily good, has a very small target, or is perhaps doing something slightly different.


It's important to draw a distinction between an attempt to find *any* way into the target network / plant a flag file / get root on the target system, or whatever, versus an attempt to find as many ways onto the target as possible in the time.

Many pentest customers think they want the latter, but get the former.

Some people would call this a "vulnerability assessment" rather than a pentest. I guess it depends whether you're joesbaitshop.com or the USAAF Strategic Air Command (nuclear strike group), who were one of the first orgs to use pentest / tiger team methods.


\a

--
Andrew Simmons
Technical Security Consultant
MessageLabs

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>