Wouldn.t the they just go after the "owner" of the public hotspot? The same
way they go after ISP's when they try to tell them it was those "pre-paid"
accounts?
I still find it sickening that my ISP is meant to censor my online activity.
Although in the above case it would have been breaking the law to
download "warez".
The standard what's next argument still applies... If they censor one thing
it's a small step to the next one and so on...
Jack.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 10:08:49AM -0700, yahoo123456@hushmail.com wrote:
Has anyone examined the idea of using a public hotspot on a local
network to shield BSA, RIAA, MPAA lawsuits? Since the tracking
stops at the public facing IP, who is to say it wasn't some
freeloader downloading the warez?
Just looking for some feedback on this one...
Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get
secure FREE email: http://www.hushmail.com/?l=2
Free, ultra-private instant messaging with Hush Messenger
http://www.hushmail.com/services-messenger?l=434
Promote security and make money with the Hushmail Affiliate Program:
http://www.hushmail.com/about-affiliate?l=427
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
--
saintau@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
