Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:46:17 -0500 (CDT) |
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Jason Coombs wrote:
J.A. Terranson wrote:didn't get my copy from Infowarrior. Nor have I seen any "order"."On Thursday, Judge Jeffrey White of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued a permanent injunction preventing further distribution of the material (attached). Cisco Systems, Inc. and Internet Security Systems, Inc. v. Michael Lynn and Black Hat Inc. United States District Court, Northern District of California." http://www.infowarrior.org/users/rforno/lynn-cisco.pdf Your point seems to be that because your name was not listed in the list of Defendants, nor were you referenced in a Does 1-99 placeholder, that the order does not apply to you.
For the sake of argument I'm going to assume that link points to the order that finally showed up? Pleae note that prior to it's arrival at infowarrior, the order was of no force nor effect - as I am sure you will agree. Assuming they have now seen and thereby become bound by the order, I am certain they will comply and honor it. However, I have neither a copy of any order, nor personal knowledge of any terms of any order, and am currently not bound to destroy any copy(s) I may have made. The law also recognizes that unenforceable orders are void on their face, and if that link is in fact an order to every person who has ever seen the document to forget and destroy - the order is impossible on it's face due to the sheer numbers of people involved. I do not much follow this crap anymore, as I am sure you noticed due to my almost non-existent posting here in the last year or so (work doesn't leave much time for play) - yet even I was sent copies by multiple people prior to hearing about it here. The barn is empty. The herd has carried the "secret" to the far corners of the earth. It's over. -- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin@mfn.org 0xBD4A95BF I like the idea of belief in drug-prohibition as a religion in that it is a strongly held belief based on grossly insufficient evidence and bolstered by faith born of intuitions flowing from the very beliefs they are intended to support. don zweig, M.D. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation, Jason Coombs |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation, Valdis . Kletnieks |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation, Jason Coombs |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversialCisco Security Presentation, Lyal Collins |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |