Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:57:15 -0500 (CDT) |
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Jason Coombs wrote:
Frank Knobbe wrote:What he has done is not say "Here's a bug that I can exploit". He has said "This IOS is capable of exploitation beyond current belief". And it will be for the foreseeable future.Precisely. And Lynn pointed out that Cisco routers use general purpose CPUs -- therefore Cisco's own engineers chose purposefully to build a vulnerable device. Cisco is responsible for this entire mess. Had they engineered a secure product around a CPU that was not general purpose, none of this would be
Jason, I both like and respect you, but you are wrong here. You just flat out don't know what you're talking about. This has nothing to do with the choice of "a general purpose CPU", it is a result of a specific architecture within the CPU chosen. There is a real difference here. You're talking like this was a negligent choice made in total disregard of known facts by Cisco, and that just isn't so. And deep down, you *know* that's true too (although it removes your premise and robs you of some wonderful /rants). Sure, Cisco chose a poor architecture, and we know that today. That doesn't mean that this was understood in the setting under which the decisions were made. This goes back a loooonnnnngggggg way. The fact is, IOS is pretty well put together, and considering it's running on an obviously deficient platform and has withstood all comers up to now is pretty amazing. They fucked up. They'll have to fix it then. But thats not the same as the gross negligence they're being accused of. <FullDisclosure> I am not a Cisco fan, and Jason can attest to that. Also, I own no stock or have any other interest in Cisco.</FullDisclosure> -- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin@mfn.org 0xBD4A95BF "A stock broker is someone who handles your money until its all gone." Diana Hubbard (of Scientology fame) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation, Daniel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation, Frank Knobbe |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation, Valdis . Kletnieks |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation, Frank Knobbe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |