Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Fw: [Full-Disclosure] Google Search and Gmail Correlation |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:28:01 +0000 |
A little OT but I was pondering the other day about something.
Remember the Axis network camera "inurl" search that exposed internet
facing LAN cameras? Well I noticed that lots of those cameras are
configured on high ports. 7000 for example. Now, I wondered how Google gets
those cameras into its cache. Ok so there may be a web facing link
_somewhere_ that references the URL... but when you search there are
hundreds of these cameras in Google's cache. Now are Google going to tell
us that they got there merely from web links? Is Google doing port scans
when it finds an IP? Probably not.... So how about the Googlebar secretly
updating Google's cache when we use these things?
Just a ponder, please dont flame me if its been covered before, I havent
got my flame-proof trousers on today! :)
Cheers,
Colin.
"Ádám Szilveszter
dr."
<adam@nhh.hu> To
Sent by: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
full-disclosure-b cc
ounces@lists.nets
ys.com Subject
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Google Search
and Gmail Correlation 24/02/2005
12:12
!
Hello Cody,
I think that what you are observing is this: the cookie you get when
visiting your gmail account is valid for the whole google.com domain, and
therefore will be transferred again when you do web searches as well.
As you write, this is not a bug per se, the cookie mechanism is working as
expected.
It is also obvious that such an approach may raise privacy concerns.
Now, *if* google wanted to mitigate this problem, it would be easy. They
should migrate the gmail service web frontend to a subdomain (say:
gmail.google.com) or even a whole new domain (gmail.com exists already but
www.gmail.com merely redirects) and make the cookie only valid in that
domain/subdomain.
The questions is, do they want to do this?
And yes, for now, if you are privacy conscious, delete the cookie before
doing a Google search (or using any other Google service).
Regards:
Szilveszter Adam
Budapest
Hungary
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
***********************************************************************************
This e-mail is confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are
not the addressee or if you have received the e-mail in error, it may
be unlawful for you to read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the
information which it contains. Under these circumstances, please notify us
immediately by returning this mail to 'mailerror@csplc.com' and deleting this
e-mail from your system.
Any views expressed by an individual within this e-mail do not necessarily
reflect the views of Cadbury Schweppes Plc or its subsidiaries. Cadbury
Schweppes Plc will not be bound by any agreement entered into as a result of
this email, unless its intention is clearly evidenced in the body of the email.
Whilst we have taken reasonable steps to ensure that this e-mail and
attachments are free from viruses, recipients are advised to subject this mail
to their own virus checking, in keeping with good computing practice. Please
note that email received by Cadbury Schweppes Plc or its subsidiaries may be
monitored in accordance with the prevailing law in the United Kingdom.
***********************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
| Previous by Date: | [Full-Disclosure] Firescrolling [Firefox 1.0], mikx |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Full-Disclosure] Narmacil project : The super worms : does it already exist?, khaalel |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] Google Search and Gmail Correlation, Thierry Zoller |
| Next by Thread: | AW: [Full-Disclosure] Google Search and Gmail Correlation, Tim Hecktor |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |