Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security FullDisclosure
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Full-Disclosure] NAT router inbound network traffic subversion

Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] NAT router inbound network traffic subversion
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:46:08 -0500
You should probably clarify exactly what type of NAT implemenation you're speaking about. After all, it's perfectly common to leverage dedicated static NATs to support inbound connections for internal (and typically non-routed) hosts.


Thank you,

Darren Bounds
Intrusense, LLC.


On Jan 28, 2005, at 1:12 AM, Kristian Hermansen wrote:

I have Googled around and asked a highly-respected Professor at my
University whether it is possible to direct packets behind a NAT router
without the internal 192.168.x.x clients first requesting a connection
to the specific host outside.  The answer I received is "not possible".
I also asked if this can be thought of as a security feature, to which
the reply was again "yes".

Now, I wouldn't place all my bets on his answer and I am calling on
someone out there to clear up my question.  If NAT really does only
allow inbound connections with a preliminary request as he suggests, it
seems that the only way to get an "unauthorized" packet behind the
router is by some flaw in the firmware of the device.

How about if the client has requested a connection to Google.com from
behind his Linksys home NAT router: would it be possible for an outside
attacker to spoof packets from Google's IP to get packets into the
network?  Or do we need to know the sequence numbers as well?  Or is
there an even more devious way to get packets on the inside without a
client's initiative?

Has there been any research into this? Are there statistics on worm
propagation and exploited network hosts in relation to those individuals
that did not own routers (and instead connected directly to their
modem)? If *all* home users on the Internet had NAT routers during the
summer of 2003, would we have significantly slowed the spread of
Blaster? I believe these all to be very important questions and the
security aspects of the ability to route packets behind NAT really
interests me...maybe some of you can elaborate :-)
--
Kristian Hermansen <khermansen@ht-technology.com>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>