Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security FullDisclosure
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS Windows Screensaver Privilege Escalation

Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS Windows Screensaver Privilege Escalation
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:40:11 -0600
--On Sunday, November 28, 2004 09:41:23 PM +1300 Nick FitzGerald <nick@virus-l.demon.co.uk> wrote:

That's because it is (more than) pretty stupid to let users install software at all. The job of system administrators is to "manage" the systems they are responsible for. With Windows systems that requires that "ordinary users" (i.e. everyone whose job is not officially "system administrator") _MUST NOT_ be allowed to install new software. Sadly, extraordinarily few Windows system admins actually have enough nouse to realize this, and most of the few who do cannot get enough management muscle to back such a "draconian" policy.

This model breaks down, of course, in the home market, where people want unfettered access to their computer.

What we need is a paradigm shift in thinking about security and computers. We need "users" to be required/forced? to change accounts to install software. Something like a virtual session, so that, when they're logged in, and they decide they want to install something, when they attempt to install, the system forces them into a virtual session, authenticates them as root/admin and performs the install within that session. Once the install completes, the session closes, and they're back to "joe user" again.

People could still override this, but they would (obviously) have to be somewhat knowledgeable to do it. (Really what we need is the unix model, where users can never be admins and admins *should* never be users, but we *all* know that's never going to happen.)

Just last night my 28 year old daughter was complaining about having to update her laptop. She called it "a second job" that she wasn't paid for. She yearns for "automated updates" that she doesn't have to deal with. On a corporate network, that's doable, but at home??? I explained to her why trusting her computer's updates to someone else was a bad thing, but that only made her more knowledgeable, not more happy. :-)

Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>