Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] Spam sent via spambots? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sun, 31 Oct 2004 20:30:06 -0500 |
And further, does anyone have any idea how to pick apart how much of that is simply relaying type activity vs.dedicated spam-bot activity?Does it matter?
Personally, I think it matters quite a bit. If the current laws are ever enforced, it could shape the way spammers operate. Instead of facing the concequences of your actions, you take over a few machines and get away with it. Or once caught, you play dumb... even though you knew all along what the systems were being used for. As I'm sure you're aware, groups of zombie machines are used for a handful of different things. Everything from DDoS attacks to the topic at hand. These groups are frequently "rented out" to do the dirty work. It's become so much of a problem that the media is picking up on it. It's been reported in the news and various forums several times. A few sample articles: (Google for more) - http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=35825 - http://www.shortnews.com/shownews.cfm?id=40747 - http://newpaper.asia1.com.sg/top/story/0,4136,67698,00.html Point being - knowing how much spam is bot-nets and how much is "legit" (as in the sender is aware they are sending it) would be good information to know. It may help enforcement of current laws or shape new ones. Having a grasp on, or some understanding of, the problem is the first step to solving it, don't you agree? Obviously laws and enforcement isn't the only means. It's obviously not done much to help so far; plus you have the added problems of who enforces what laws where. Check http://www.spamlaws.com/ for more info on your local area (worldwide). (P.S. Removed your email address from the "Reply All" as requested Nick. Hopefully this will serve as a reminder to others that you prefer not to receive duplicates.) -- Peace. ~G On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 18:22:36 -0600 (CST), J.A. Terranson <measl@mfn.org> wrote:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Nick FitzGerald wrote:In another thread Hugo van der Kooij wrote:Securing every machine on the internet would be a good start. 95% of all spam messages I have seen lately gets send from DSL or Cable IP addresses. These are machine which run spamware without the user knowing (s)he is sending out spam by the buckets untill their ISP shuts them down.Really? 95%? Does anyone have sound statistics on how much spam comes from DSL/Cable IP-space?We see at minimum, several thousand a day, and while I can't give you a statistic, I can state with great confidence that the vast majority, likely a lot higher than 95%, comes from zombied machines, almost all on DSL/Cable space.And further, does anyone have any idea how to pick apart how much of that is simply relaying type activity vs.dedicated spam-bot activity?Does it matter? -- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin@mfn.org 0xBD4A95BF "An ill wind is stalking while evil stars whir and all the gold apples go bad to the core" S. Plath, Temper of Time _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] Spam sent via spambots?, GuidoZ |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] Spam sent via spambots?, James Riden |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] Spam sent via spambots?, James Riden |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: I will be awaiting your immediate response., n3td3v |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |