Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: FW: [Full-Disclosure] JPEG AV Detection |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:44:01 -0400 |
Anyone else have any input?
/gerry
What exactly are the AV products detecting in the JPEG exploits? Barry and I was talking about how impressed we were that the AV companies jumped on this one and detection was pretty fast. But is the detection so generic that a variant will bypass? Is the detection based on a original exploit that could be modified in a way that makes it "undetectable" right now?
-Todd
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Fitzgerald [mailto:bkfsec@sdf.lonestar.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 1:55 PM
To: Todd Towles
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Full-Disclosure digest, Vol 1 #1933 -
20 msgs
Todd Towles wrote:
Yep, really surprised. Just hopefully the invalid data that is being detected can't be changed or worked in a work that would bypass normal detection. Once the file is renamed to a BMP or a GIF, you confuse the whole thing even more.
Are the AV products hitting on a part of the original exploit? Can this
part be changed in a future version to make it "undetectable". I am very impressed at the work of the AV companines on this one, but I also
know that is this detection is too simple, that it will be bypassed.
I'm not sure what they're specifically detecting. This may be a good question for the list.
-Barry
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
-- Gerald Eisenhaur Cisco Systems, Inc. 1414 Massachusetts Ave. Boxborough, Massachusetts 01719 voice: 978.936.0465 geisenhaur@cisco.com
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] JPEG GDI, Barrie Dempster |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Full-Disclosure] JPEG GDI, Todd Towles |
| Previous by Thread: | FW: [Full-Disclosure] JPEG AV Detection, Todd Towles |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Full-Disclosure] JPEG AV Detection, Bojan Zdrnja |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |