Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security FullDisclosure
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Automated ssh scanning

Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Automated ssh scanning
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:54:37 -0400
Will *ANYONE* that actually got hacked do me a favor and type:
"uname -a"
Then include that in your next email. I keep hearing "fully patched" server however I have a feeling the Kernel was left out of the patching.


-KF


Todd Towles wrote:
Hey Ron,

Guest isn't a admin so they let the tool get in. But the real questions
is, how does it get root access on a fully patched server? It appears to
use a local exploit to gain root access. This is a problem.


Sorry about the eariler e-mail, I haven't had my coffee today. Trying to
cut back and spend that money on IT security =P

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Ron
DuFresne
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 9:08 AM
To: Tig
Cc: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Automated ssh scanning



the real thing this user most likely suffered from was the weak account
passwd double, guest:guest.  Now, if the admin and other account were
setup with strong passwd's and this account was either setup with a
strong passwd or not setup at all might be a better test of the
stability of ssh and the debain setup in question.

Thanks,

Ron DuFresne

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Tig wrote:


On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:43:47 -0400
Gerry Eisenhaur <GEisenhaur@Cisco.com> wrote:


I am confused, you said you knew about some SSH scanning going on, then set up those accounts on a box. Now you are curious way that box got rooted?

Maybe I am missing something, but it seems you already have a pretty


good assumption of why it got rooted.

The software, as you seem to know, is a few exploits, a backdoor and


some IRC stuff(bot and proxy).

/gerry


I think you did miss the point (which was a very good one). Basically,


once you have unprivileged access to a currently patched Woody box, you can quickly gain root access.

I would love to see this tested against other version of Linux and *BSD with default (and updated) installations. Anyone have a spare box


and a few hours?

-Tig

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity.  It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
        ***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***

OK, so you're a Ph.D.  Just don't touch anything.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>