Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: [Full-Disclosure] Cool Web Search |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:39:02 -0500 |
The creator of CWShredder claims the newest versions of CWS are very stealthy and I believe he as stopped updating the program. Therefore CWShredder isn't the best for the newest. But as far as I understood things (from other mailing list and forum post), HiJackThis wasn't removing them 100% either. Todd -----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Richard Golodner Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 5:51 PM To: 'Gregh'; Disclosure Full Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Cool Web Search Try CWShredder too! -----Original Message----- From: Gregh [mailto:chows@ozemail.com.au] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 5:46 PM To: Disclosure Full Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Cool Web Search JFYI of anyone interested: On Nanog a short time back, most of the list there decided that CWS couldn't easily be removed. I first stumbled across it maybe around the start of July and have had many instances of it, since, in many places. Adaware does bugger-all to remove it. Spybot recognised it, got rid of it and upon reboot it was back. It was never quite clear from a simple inspection, what was putting it back. When I first found it, I had also found "HiJackThis" and ran it. That prog brought up the proper registry entries to enable me to correctly identify CWS, remove the entries and delete files. It took some time the first time I saw it but it takes about 10 mins (if that) to get rid of it, now. Nanog disagreed and said it wasn't that easy. It simply WAS that easy. I just happened to experience "dumb luck" and be one of the first (if not the first) to easily get rid of it through HiJackThis. So, for those of you who don't think Nanog is full of "Gods of Correctness", if you are having probs with removal of CWS, get HiJackThis, let it scan and then you will see, sticking out like a wart on your......nose :)........ the entries you need to delete in order to properly rid that machine of CWS. It wasn't hard using that prog. Greg. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cool Web Search, JacK |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] Automated SSH login attempts?, Andrew Farmer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cool Web Search, Gregh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cool Web Search, KF (lists) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |