Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:28:03 -0500 |
That is odd. You *must have some translations in place. Because you *must have (2) different subnets. ( One outside and another on the inside ) So when a packets transverses the pix and is sent outbound it must be translated - Nat inside / Outside or Nat 0 when using VPNs. JP -----Original Message----- From: Cyril Guibourg [mailto:plonk-o-matic@teaser.fr] Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 1:18 PM To: Otero, Hernan (EDS) Cc: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint "Otero, Hernan (EDS)" <HOtero@lanchile.cl> writes:
I think you do, because at least a nat 0 it´s needed to get traffic
passing
through the pix.
This is odd, I do have a running config under 6.2 without any nat statement. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint, Cyril Guibourg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Full-Disclosure] Tools for checking for presence of Adware r remotely, Perrymon, Josh L. |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint, James Patterson Wicks |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint, Charlie Winckless |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |